Sub-Synchronous Turbo machinery Faults

Sub-synchronous vibration peaks (0.5X < f < 1X) are often caused by rotor-related excitation forces, not just oil whirl or bearing issues. These peaks, influenced by rotor speed and imbalance, can indicate faults like trapped fluid, seal defects, or looseness in stationary parts.

Like what you see? Sign up to share your own knowledge, like posts, and engage with the community!

Random Sub-synchronous Turbomachinery Faults

(It is not always Oil Whirl or Journal Bearing issues)

Unlike frequency band between (0 < f < 0.5X), sub-synchronous bandwidth (0.5X < f < 1X) could cause some confusion when interpreting vibration peaks within it or trying to imagine timing (frequency) of faults within this region.

This frequency span involves the response of excitation forces that relates DIRECTLY to rotor rotation (NOT whirling). In this region, peak of vibration signal occurs at one and part of rotor rotation.

👉 0.67X = 1 Peak per 1.5 revolution
👉 0.75X = 1 Peak per 1.33 revolution
👉 0.80X = 1 Peak per 1.25 revolution
👉 and so on..

This means (in my interpretation for several diagnostic cases) that is some sort of force that is delayed from rotor residual unbalance rotation by a constant time. This indicates some faults such as:

✔ Trapped fluid (fluid whirl inside a bore clearance slower than rotor speed)
✔ Seal defects at specific point that causes leak pulses or non-uniform turbulence (e.g. partial stall, fouling, flow restriction, etc.)
✔ Looseness or crack in stationary part (ring or labyrinth) that lowers its natural frequency below 1X slightly

🛠 All these faults are common that the rotor is the element that CONTROLS their peak amplitude. If we change rotor speed or reduce rotor residual imbalance (or even load in thermal sensitive rotors), its value will be decreased rapidly and simultaneously.

📈 If we cannot do this at certain moment, monitoring the peak will be enough unless another fault symptom interferes with its response causing (often) a nonlinear behavior. In all cases, it won't be eliminated unless we remove the source of excitation itself during maintenance activities.

💡 Notice that images represent different cases for above possibilities! Share your experience in comments. Do you experience random peaks below 1X frequency. If so, what was your interpretation!?

Additional Images
Post Information
Category: Vibration Case Study
Language: English
Reading Time: 2 min
Tags
Sub-synchronous Turbomachinery Faults
Original Authors
Ahmed Mosbah
Shared By
Reliability

Login to view profile

Join Our Community

Sign up to share knowledge, engage with posts, and connect with experts.

Sign Up